On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:42 PM, aaron morton wrote:
> > What is "MM" stands for? million ?
>
> Yup.
>
> No idea why I do that.
I should note that some people use "1MM" to indicate "1 million
milion" ie. 1 billion, so this might be doubly confusing for some ;)
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor,
> What is "MM" stands for? million ?
Yup.
No idea why I do that.
cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 12/09/2012, at 11:25 AM, Data Craftsman 木匠
wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, as always. :) I'll read yo
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for the suggestion, as always. :) I'll read your slides soon.
What is "MM" stands for? million ?
Thanks,
Charlie
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:37 PM, aaron morton wrote:
> In general wider rows take a bit longer to read, however different access
> patterns have different perfor
In general wider rows take a bit longer to read, however different access
patterns have different performance. I did some tests here
http://www.slideshare.net/aaronmorton/cassandra-sf-2012-technical-deep-dive-query-performance
and http://thelastpickle.com/2011/07/04/Cassandra-Query-Plans/
I wou
Hello experts.
Should I limit the number of rows per Composite Primary Key's leading column?
I think it falls into the same wide row good practice for number of
columns per row for CQL 2.0, e.g. 10M or less.
Any comments will be appreciated.
--
Thanks,
Charlie (@mujiang) 木匠
===
Data Archi
