That spreadsheet doesn't take compression into account, which is very
important in my case. Uncompressed, my data is going to require a
petabyte of storage according to the spreadsheet. I am pretty sure I
won't get that much storage to play with.
The spreadsheet also shows that Cassandra waste
It may help.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Atatq_AL3AJwdElwYVhTRk9KZF9WVmtDTDVhY0xPSmc#gid=0
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Robert Važan wrote:
> I need to store one trillion data points. The data is highly compressible
> down to 1 byte per data point using simple custom compres
I need to store one trillion data points. The data is highly compressible
down to 1 byte per data point using simple custom compression combined with
standard dictionary compression. What's the most space-efficient way to
store the data in Cassandra? How much per-row overhead is there if I store
on
