Thanks Tim,
> Significant number of writes / second -> possibly a good use case for
cassandra.
what is a significant number for you?
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Minimum-database-size-and-ops-second-to-start-consi
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:17 -0700, motta.lrd wrote:
> What is the minimum database size and number of Operations/Second (reads and
> write) for which I should seriously consider this database?
Significant number of writes / second -> possibly a good use case for
cassandra.
Database size is a di
size and
workload) for adopting it in production.
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Minimum-database-size-and-ops-second-to-start-considering-Cassandra-tp7593918.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org
