d index. But it also
> seems to be bad to have too many CFs. We have requirements to support high
> volume min of 500 writes + 500 reads per sec.
>
> What would you advise?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.306514
ments to support high
> volume min of 500 writes + 500 reads per sec.
>
> What would you advise?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/How-to-create-data-model-from-RDBMS-ERD-tp6509041p6509041.html
> Sent fro
you can create the inverted index in the same CF ... just means you
would have potentially lots more rows ...
do you have a use-case or hypothetical you can share? if not ... here's one.
http://code.google.com/p/oauth-php it has an RDBMs suggested
model
http://oauth-php.googlecode.com/svn/
this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/How-to-create-data-model-from-RDBMS-ERD-tp6509041p6509041.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.