Also, Sylvain, you have couple of great posts about relationships between
CQL3/Thrift entities and naming issues:
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cql3-for-cassandra-experts
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/thrift-to-cql3
I always refer to them when I get confuse :)
Regards,
Shahab
On Fri, Sep
Hi,
Well, that was a word to word quotation. :)
Anyways, I think what you just said is a better explanation than those two
previous ones. I hope it ends up on the wiki page because what it says
there now is causing confusion, no matter how correct it technically is :)
Cheers,
Hannu
2013/9/6 Sy
Well, I don't know if that's what Patrick replied but that's not correct.
The wording *is* correct, though it does uses CQL3 terms.
For CQL3, the term "partition" is used to describe all the (CQL) rows that
share the same partition key (If you don't know what the latter is:
http://cassandra.apache.
I asked the same thing earlier and this is what patrick mcfadin replied: "It's
not worded well. Essentially it's saying there is a 2B limit on a row. It
should be worded a 'CQL row'"
I hope helps.
Cheers,
Hannu
On 6.9.2013, at 8.20, J Ramesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/ca
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/CassandraLimitations
In the above link, I found the below limitation,
"The maximum number of cells (rows x columns) in a single partition is 2
billion.".
Here what does "partition" mean ? Is it node (or) column family (or)
anything else ?
Thanks,
Ramesh
