Re: Failed to solve Digest mismatch

2013-10-09 Thread Jason Tang
I did some test on this issue, and it turns out the problem caused by local time stamp. In our traffic, the update and delete happened very fast, within 1 seconds, even within 100ms. And at that time, the ntp service seems not work well, the offset is same times even larger then 1 second. Then the

Re: Failed to solve Digest mismatch

2012-07-04 Thread aaron morton
Jason, Are you able document the steps to reproduce this on a clean install ? Is so do you have time to create an issue on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA Thanks - Aaron Morton Freelance Developer @aaronmorton http://www.thelastpickle.com On 2

Re: Failed to solve Digest mismatch

2012-07-01 Thread Jason Tang
For the create/update/deleteColumn/deleteRow test case, for Quorum consistency level, 6 nodes, replicate factor 3, for one thread around 1/100 round, I can have this reproduced. And if I have 20 client threads to run the test client, the ratio is bigger. And the test group will be executed by one

Re: Failed to solve Digest mismatch

2012-06-30 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Is this Cassandra 1.1.1? How often do you observe this? How many columns are in the row? Can you reproduce when querying by column name, or only when "slicing" the row? On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Jason Tang wrote: > Hi > >    First I delete one column, then I delete one row. Then try to

Failed to solve Digest mismatch

2012-06-28 Thread Jason Tang
Hi First I delete one column, then I delete one row. Then try to read all columns from the same row, all operations from same client app. The consistency level is read/write quorum. Check the Cassandra log, the local node don't perform the delete operation but send the mutation to other