On 3/30/2011 1:11 AM, Gregori Schmidt wrote
>
> * You need to have official client libraries and they need to be
> programmer friendly. Yes, I know there are nice people
> maintaining a plethora of different libraries, but you need to
> man up and face reality: the chaos tha
//cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Ditching-Cassandra-tp6221436p6231654.html
> Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
View this message in context:
> http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Ditching-Cassandra-tp6221436p6231654.html
> Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
Where can I read more about CQL? I am assuming it's similar to SQL and
drivers like JDBC can be written on top of it. Is that right?
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Ditching-Cassandra-tp6221436p6231654.html
Sent from the cass
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:52 -0500, Jeremiah Jordan wrote:
>> Quick comment on libraries for different languages.
>> The libraries for different languages should almost ALWAYS look
>> different. They should look like what someone using that languag
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:52 -0500, Jeremiah Jordan wrote:
> Quick comment on libraries for different languages.
> The libraries for different languages should almost ALWAYS look
> different. They should look like what someone using that language
> expects an API to look like.
+1 The language APIs
named keyword arguments I would have
to shoot myself.
-Jeremiah
From: Gregori Schmidt [mailto:grokd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:04 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ditching Cassandra
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Eric Evans
Gregori,
Congrats on writing the fud-liest post of the month award. Firstly if
you don't like updates give up on computers and software. Especally
give up on anything that has to do with nosql because it is fast
evolving.
If you think you have a problem with the cassandra api, then what you
really
Thanks for the feedback Gregori,
We in Australia are only concerned with solutions as we are a solutions focused
organization. With respect to your feedback, you and your team seem to have
identified no solutions other than jumping ship. When we subscribed to the 50
or so emails per day, we wan
Hello Edward,
have you a working kudera+spring example with JPA annotations?
Best Regards,
Anton
While I respect your decision...
If you are tired of writing code there are solutions around coding
everything there are tools like http://code.google.com/p/kundera/
This is verbose:
http://java
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Drew Kutcharian wrote:
> Hi Gregori,
>
> I'm about to start a new project and I was considering using MongoDB too,
> but I just couldn't find a nice way to scale it. Seems like for scaling you
> need to use the same style as MySQL, having master/slaves and replica
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> The client space as a whole *is* a mess, despite heroic efforts on the
> part of our third-party API maintainers, but forcing them in-tree is not
> going to solve anything. In fact, it would very likely make it worse by
> adding unnecessary ov
My concern when I see something like this is it might cause developers
on the project to get worried and start to try to solve the wrong
problems. Cassandra is not going to be as easy as Mongo, certainly
not any time soon. CQL won't do it, although it will help. This
isn't a criticism of Cassand
.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Colin wrote:
> Thank you Eric. I appreciate it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Evans [mailto:eev...@rackspace.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:47 PM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Ditching Cassandra
>
&g
Thank you Eric. I appreciate it.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Evans [mailto:eev...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:47 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ditching Cassandra
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 20:56 -0500, Colin wrote:
> Are you saying that 8 will or not
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 19:58 -0700, mcasandra wrote:
> I am also interested in knowing when 8 will be released.
We're targeting the week of May 9th.
> Also, is there someplace where we can read about features that will be
> relased in 8? Looks like some major changes are going to come out.
The
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 20:56 -0500, Colin wrote:
> Are you saying that 8 will or not be compatible with 7?
You will be able to perform a rolling upgrade from 0.7.x to 0.8. That
is to say, you'll be able to upgrade each node one at a time, mixing 0.7
and 0.8 nodes until the upgrade is complete.
>
rom: Edward Capriolo [mailto:edlinuxg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:58 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ditching Cassandra
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Colin wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Seems like the answer to everything is 8.
>
> 8 has been very painful.
>
/Ditching-Cassandra-tp6221436p6221685.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Colin wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Seems like the answer to everything is 8.
>
> 8 has been very painful.
>
> Are you saying that 8 will or not be compatible with 7?
>
> If not, would you recommend waiting until 8? We have done an awful lot of
> work, have an awful lot of
Eric,
Seems like the answer to everything is 8.
8 has been very painful.
Are you saying that 8 will or not be compatible with 7?
If not, would you recommend waiting until 8? We have done an awful lot of
work, have an awful lot of work left, and have become very frustrated.
Any idea on when
Hi Gregori,
What language *were* you using to interact with cassandra? were you unable
to find a wrapper API that you found
We have discussed adopting the "best of" client api's in cassandra but we
decided it's better for the community to naturally develop them. I think
this has also motivated E
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 02:11 +0200, Gregori Schmidt wrote:
>- The API is horrible and it produces pointlessly verbose code in
>addition to being utterly confusing. EVERYTHING takes a lot of
> time to implement with Cassandra, and to be frank, it is incredibly
> tiring. For this reason alon
Hi Gregori,
I'm about to start a new project and I was considering using MongoDB too, but I
just couldn't find a nice way to scale it. Seems like for scaling you need to
use the same style as MySQL, having master/slaves and replicas, which for us
was a deal breaker. We just couldn't see how you
hi,
After using Cassandra during development for the past 8 months my team and I
made the decision to switch from Cassandra to MongoDB this morning. I
thought I'd share some thoughts on why we did this and where Cassandra might
benefit from improvement.
- The API is horrible and it produces p
25 matches
Mail list logo
