Re: Consistency level 256

2013-11-19 Thread Ben Hood
Thanks for the heads up - I'll take a look at the driver. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > 256 is clearly not a valid CL code. It's of course always possible that the > client sends something perfectly valid and the server interprets it badly > for some reason, but it's

Re: Consistency level 256

2013-11-19 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
256 is clearly not a valid CL code. It's of course always possible that the client sends something perfectly valid and the server interprets it badly for some reason, but it's a lot more likely a priori that the driver just sends something wrong. In any case, since as far as I know no-one has seen

Re: Consistency level 256

2013-11-18 Thread Ben Hood
I'm not sure that this is entirely causal, but the error I was getting occurred when the batch size I was accumulating was greater than 130K, so by cutting the batch size down, I made the issue go away for now. Having a such a large batch size is probably not such a good idea, but I'm not really su

Consistency level 256

2013-11-18 Thread Ben Hood
Hi, Using 2.0.2 with the gocql driver, I'm getting this intermittent error: "Unknown code 256 for a consistency level" Is this something that the server could be returning, or is this maybe only a client side issue? Cheers, Ben