On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:09 PM, AJ wrote:
> It says "all nodes". Shouldn't it say "replication_factor nodes"?
My preferred phrasing would be "all replicas."
> I can understand this if the given row already exists from a previous write
> and one of the nodes that contains a replica is down. Bu
The O'Reilly book on Cass says this about READ consistency level ALL:
"Query all nodes. Wait for all nodes to respond, and return to the
client the record with the most recent timestamp. Then, if necessary,
perfrom a read repair in the background. If any nodes fail or respond,
fail the read o
