On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Aditya Muralidharan
wrote:
> Thanks for the response. We're trying to get a general idea of the insert and
> retrieval performance, and we figured BinaryMemtable would be a great enabler
> for our bulk import scenarios. Normal thrift inserts are certainly fast, b
e our throughput.
Are you able to share some general performance numbers for thrift/avro/bmt?
Thanks.
AD
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Ellis [mailto:jbel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:23 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: Cassandra 0.7 beta3 BinaryMemtable and Superco
ler.java:42)
>
>
>
> … which is basically because the CFSerializer is (rightly) expecting to
> deserialize a super column though the bmt_example serialized a Standard CF.
>
>
>
> Any help on BMT with supercolumns would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
&
From: Aditya Muralidharan [mailto:aditya.muralidha...@nisc.coop]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:27 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Cassandra 0.7 beta3 BinaryMemtable and Supercolumns
Is it possible for BinaryMemtable RowMutations to a ColumnFamily with
supercolumns?
Is it possible for BinaryMemtable RowMutations to a ColumnFamily with
supercolumns?
