assandra.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: CQL: No indexed column error when < or <= in WHERE clause
> This will be fully solved with CASSANDRA-2915 which will use Lucene as
> a the secondary index type implementation. Lucene has extremely fast
> range queries built in.
>
> On Sun,
he number column in station column family. Do I also have
>> > to index another column?
>> >
>> > What I'm wondering, when I type "get station where number = 8210;" all
>> > works fine, but when I type "get station where number &
olumn?
> >
> > What I'm wondering, when I type "get station where number = 8210;" all
> works fine, but when I type "get station where number < 8210;" I'll get
> mentioned exception.
> >
> > Is there something, that I misunderstand?
&g
where number = 8210;" all works
> fine, but when I type "get station where number < 8210;" I'll get mentioned
> exception.
>
> Is there something, that I misunderstand?
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:14:05 -07
tion.
Is there something, that I misunderstand?
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:14:05 -0700
> Von: Jonathan Ellis
> An: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: CQL: No indexed column error when < or <= in WHERE clause
> This is covered in
>
This is covered in
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/whats-new-cassandra-07-secondary-indexes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jens Hartung wrote:
> Hi together,
>
> first, I'm using Cassandra Version 0.8.4 and access it via CQL 1.0.3.
>
> When I select data from Cassandra with = in WHERE clause,
Hi together,
first, I'm using Cassandra Version 0.8.4 and access it via CQL 1.0.3.
When I select data from Cassandra with = in WHERE clause, everything works
fine, but when using <= or < in WHERE clause, I always get following Exception:
java.sql.SQLException: No indexed columns present in by-c
