Re: [deletion in the future]

2013-07-20 Thread Richard Low
On 20 July 2013 15:16, Alexis Rodríguez wrote: > That's exactly what is happening with my row, but not what I was trying to > do. It seems that I misunderstood the stackoverflow post. I was trying to > schedule a delete for an entire row, is using ttl for columns the only way? > Yes, there's no

Re: [deletion in the future]

2013-07-20 Thread Alexis Rodríguez
Richard, That's exactly what is happening with my row, but not what I was trying to do. It seems that I misunderstood the stackoverflow post. I was trying to schedule a delete for an entire row, is using ttl for columns the only way? Thanks for the reply. On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Richa

Re: [deletion in the future]

2013-07-20 Thread Richard Low
On 19 July 2013 23:31, Alexis Rodríguez wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've read here [1] that you can make a deletion mutation "for" the future. > That mechanism operates as a schedule for deletions according to the > stackoverflow post. But, I've been having problems to make it work with > my thrift c++

[deletion in the future]

2013-07-19 Thread Alexis Rodríguez
Hi guys, I've read here [1] that you can make a deletion mutation "for" the future. That mechanism operates as a schedule for deletions according to the stackoverflow post. But, I've been having problems to make it work with my thrift c++ client. I believe it's related to this paragraph of the thr