The only advantage is the RF is per keyspace
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:57 AM, David Boxenhorn wrote:
> I just saw this note from storage-conf.xml:
>
> "Except in very unusual circumstances you will have one Keyspace per
> application."
>
> Why is that?
>
> I was thinking of putting our "normal d
The real tragedy is that we have not created a new acronym for this yet...
OKVM... it makes more sense...
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Ethan Rowe wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 01:26 PM, Isaac Arias wrote:
>
>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Geoffry Roberts wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Clearly Cassandra is
just make them one cluster, and use the rackAware logic...
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Campbell, Joseph <
joseph_campb...@comcast.com> wrote:
> Question:
>It is possible to setup Cassandra such that 2 independent
> Cassandra rings/clusters replicate to one another, ensuring that each
Is crashing really how it should deal with restricted memory? Seems like if
this was true either a minimum required memory needs to be defined, or it
should adjust how it uses memory in the absence of it...
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Avinash Lakshman <
avinash.laksh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
. For large data sets,
> that can be a significant win.
>
>
> b
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, banks wrote:
> > Then from an IT standpoint, if i'm using a RF of 3, it stands to reason
> that
> > running on Raid 1 makes sense, since RAID and RF achieve th
; On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:41 PM, banks wrote:
> >
> > 2. each cassandra node essentially has the same datastore as all nodes,
> > correct?
>
> No. The ReplicationFactor you set determines how many copies of a
> piece of data you want. If your number of nodes is higher tha
good question, any answers?
2010/4/6 AJ Chen
> that looks good. is there a similar cassandra tool in java?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:59 PM, selam wrote:
>
>> look at chiton on github.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:06 AM, AJ Chen wrote:
>> > Is there a generic GUI tool for viewing cassan
1. I have a farm of web servers, two of them write the same supercolumn full
of various data (day 100 columns), can the various columns end up mixed and
matched within the super column? I know there is no real form of
transaction, but if i'm using batch_insert do they all go in consistent? or
is i
I can see the logic of having an internal DNS entry '
seednodes.internaldomain.com',
this might only have 3 defined seed nodes out of 100, but the benefit is
single point configuration, no need to edit configs across 100 machines,
easily redefinable on the fly as needed...
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 1
