ally by updating all the data in the same time.
Is this the right way to go? Or what I am doing is still trying to
convert Cassandra to a RDBMS?
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:29 AM, aXqd wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Benoit Perroud
>> wrote:
>> >
s SYNCDB does.
According to my limited experience with Cassandra, now, we do more
when we write, and less when we read/query. Hence I think the problem
lies exactly in how we duplicate our data to do queries.
Please correct me if I got these all wrong.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:12
e deferred to be resolved. Thanks.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:12 AM, aXqd wrote:
>> Hi, all:
>>
>> I know many people regard O/R Mapping as rubbish. However it is
>> undeniable that ORM is quite easy to use in most simple cases,
>> Meanwhile Cassandra is
Hi, all:
I know many people regard O/R Mapping as rubbish. However it is
undeniable that ORM is quite easy to use in most simple cases,
Meanwhile Cassandra is well known as No-SQL solution, a.k.a.
No-Relational solution.
So maybe it's weird to combine ORM and Cassandra, right? Is there
anything we
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Zhiguo Zhang wrote:
> I think it is still to young, and have to wait or write your self the
> "graphical console", at least, I don't find any until now.
Frankly speaking, I'm OK to be without GUI...But I am really
disappointed by those so-called 'documents'.
I rea
