Why not send the value itself instead of a placeholder? Now it takes
2x writes on a random node to do a single update (write placeholder,
write update) and N*x writes from the client (write value, write
placeholder to N-1). Where N is replication factor. Seems like extra
network and IO in
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 1, 2011, at 9:53 PM, AJ wrote:
Is this possible?
All reads and writes for a given key will always go to the same node
from a client.
I don't think that's true. Given a key K, the client will write to N
nodes (N=replication factor). And at consistency level O
Sadly, they all went down within minutes of each other.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Sasha Dolgy wrote:
Implement monitoring and be proactive...that will stop you waking up
to a big surprise. i'm sure there were symltoms leading up to all 4
nodes going down. willing t
