RE: Reverse a delete operation

2014-02-25 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
astax.com/what-we-offer/products-services/training/virtual-training> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:13 PM, PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY mailto:bp1...@att.com>> wrote: We deleted a row by mistake. Is there a way to somehow recover it? Thanks <>

Reverse a delete operation

2014-02-25 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
We deleted a row by mistake. Is there a way to somehow recover it? Thanks

Failed to decode value

2014-02-17 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
Hi When I do a CQL3 select * on TABLE1 (describe below), I see rows displayed but get this error at the end "Failed to decode value '9131146' (for column 'accountId') as bigint: unpack requires a string argument of length 8" Cassandra version 1.2.5. accountId is of type "text". Why would

RE: Worse perf after Row Caching version 1.2.5:

2014-02-13 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
ached, it will be used. You need to use "select * from table where X=Y" to populate row cache. when setting caching = "rows_only" you disable key cache which might hurt your performance. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:05 PM, PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY mailto:bp1...@att.com>>

RE: Worse perf after Row Caching version 1.2.5:

2014-02-12 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
d Solutions Architect, DataStax (404) 822 3487 [Image removed by sender.]<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jlacefield> [Image removed by sender.]<http://www.datastax.com/what-we-offer/products-services/training/virtual-training> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:26 AM, PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY m

Worse perf after Row Caching version 1.2.5:

2014-02-11 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
Hi, I have two tables and I enabled row caching for both of them using CQL. These two CF's are very small with one about 300 rows and other < 2000 rows. The rows themselves are small. Cassandra heap: 8gb. a. alter table TABLE_X with caching = 'rows_only'; b. alter table TABLE_Y with c

RE: Leveled Compaction, number of SStables growing.

2013-07-09 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
compaction with lot of data, it will take time for it to compact. You might want to increase the compaction settings to speed it up. On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:33 PM, PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY mailto:bp1...@att.com>> wrote: Thanks Jake. Guess we will have to increase the size. From: Jake L

RE: Leveled Compaction, number of SStables growing.

2013-07-09 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
by design so this is the only way to lower the file count. On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY mailto:bp1...@att.com>> wrote: Hi, We recently switched from size tired compaction to Leveled compaction. We made this change because our rows are frequently updated. We also

Leveled Compaction, number of SStables growing.

2013-07-09 Thread PARASHAR, BHASKARJYA JAY
Hi, We recently switched from size tired compaction to Leveled compaction. We made this change because our rows are frequently updated. We also have a lot of data. With size-tiered compaction, we have about 5-10 sstables per CF. So with about 15 CF's we had about 100 sstables. With a sstable def