Ich bin von Fr, 18.12.2020 bis Do, 18.02.2021 abwesend.
Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht "Re:
Repairs on table with daily full load" gesendet am 18.12.2020 01:22:13.
Diese ist die einzige Benachrichtigung, die Sie empfangen werden, während
diese Person abwesend
gation.
Em qua., 2 de dez. de 2020 às 12:44, Nicolai Lune Vest
escreveu:
Hi,
we performed a test run with 3.11.9. Unfortunately we do not experience a
difference regarding increased read latency at some of our tables.
Do others experience the same or similar behavior and probab
Hi,
we performed a test run with 3.11.9. Unfortunately we do not experience a
difference regarding increased read latency at some of our tables.
Do others experience the same or similar behavior and probably do have a
solution?
Kind regards,
Nico
-"Nicolai Lune Vest"
53, Johannes Weißl a écrit :
Hi Nico,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:51PM +0200, Nicolai Lune Vest wrote:
> after upgrading my Cassandra nodes from version 3.11.6 to either
> 3.11.7 or 3.11.8 I experience a significant increase in read latency.
Have you (or others) any update on that? Does t
Hi Maxim,
unfortunately no. We decided to stay at 3.11.6 for production until we
found a solution because our system is latency sensitive too.
>From what I can see the most impact on read-latency is on the tables using
time windowed compaction strategy. Tables with e.g. leveled compaction
strat
Dear Cassandra community,
after upgrading my Cassandra nodes from version 3.11.6 to either 3.11.7 or
3.11.8 I experience a significant increase in read latency.
With 3.11.6 average read latency is ~0.35 ms. With 3.11.7 average read
latency increases to ~2.9 ms, almost 10 times worse! This behavi
