which versions of cassandra 2.x and 3.x are best for avoiding sstable
corruption and schema migration slowness?
is this a "cassandra is not a set it and forget it system" concept?
Chief Executive Officer
m 202.905.2818
Anant Corporation
1010 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 250
Washington, D.C. 20007
We build and manage digital business technology platforms.
On Aug 14, 2018, 11:49 AM -0500, David Payne
mailto:dav...@cqg.com>>, wrote:
Scenario: Cassandra 2.2.7, 3 nodes
mp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C7231eb88a6154a6520bf08d60964367b%7C0f96d359c20349d1a42dcbb27249db0d%7C0%7C0%7C636706723366003689&sdata=p0KhN5D2H%2B1bZ%2B2jeOXSV8OSaRCJTqHmH6ffFzwwfNU%3D&reserved=0>
Washington, D.C. 20007
We build and manage digital business technology platforms.
On Aug 14, 2018, 11:49 AM -0500, David Payne
m
compaction for the
truncated table for node 2 and 3, but not node 1.
This appears to be a defect that was fixed in 2.1.0.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7803
Any ideas?
Thanks,
David Payne
| ̄ ̄|
_☆☆☆_
( ´_⊃`)
c. 303-717-0548
dav...@cqg.com<mailto:dav...@cqg.com>
-L474
MAX_INTERVAL_IN_NANO seems to be how this is controlled. Where does the result
of getMaxInterval() which sets MAX_INTERVAL_IN_NANO come from?
Thanks,
David Payne
| ̄ ̄|
_☆☆☆_
( ´_⊃`)
c. 303-717-0548
dav...@cqg.com<mailto:dav...@cqg.com>
Hello Cassandra Experts and Committers,
Hopefully this is just a dumb question, but without the skill set to read the
source code, I must ask.
Consider incremental backups are enabled on 2.x or 3.x. As memtables flush to
sstables on disk, hardlinks are created in backups for the column family.