Cassandra does not support this currently. You can create a JIRA and start
the conversation
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:09 PM, Dan Kinder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're optimizing Cassandra right now for fairly random reads on a large
> dataset. In this dataset, the values are much larger than the keys.
Hi friends,
*TL;DR: Making a plan for 4.0, ideally everyone interested should provide
up to two lists, one for tickets they can contribute resources to getting
finished, and one for features they think would be desirable for 4.0, but
not necessarily have the resources to commit to helping with.*
S
Mahdi , the issue in your code is here:
else // we lost LWT, fetch the winning value
9existing_id = SELECT id FROM hash_id WHERE hash=computed_hash |
consistency = ONE
You lost LWT, it means that there is a concurrent LWT that has won the
Paxos round and has applied the value using QUORUM/SE
Totally understood that it's not worth (or it's rather incorrect) to mix
serial and non serial operations for LWT tables. It would be highly
satisfying to my engineer mind if someone can explain why that would
cause issues in this particular situation. The only explanation I have
is that a non
