Yes.
If your IDE is starting cassandra the settings from cassandra-env.sh will not
be used.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 13/09/2012, at 12:41 PM, Manu Zhang wrote:
> I'm afraid we have to include all $JVM_OPTS in the c
> Range queries do not use bloom filters.
Are you talking about row range queries ? Or a slice of columns in a row ?
If you are getting a slice of columns from a single row, a bloom filter is used
to locate the row.
If you are getting a slice of columns from a range of rows, the bloom filter i
I'm fairly new to Cassandra myself, but had to solve a similar problem. If
ordering of the student number values is not important to you, you can
store them as UTF8 values (Ascii would work too, may be a better choice?),
and the resulting columns would be sorted by the lexical ordering of the
nume
> Remove . AND Add . such that if . is
> NOT found, the whole row will be scanned for . and remove that
> value instead.
Couple of thoughts:
* that sounds like something that would need a lock or transaction to stop
changes when things were scanned. e.g. You would need the sort of key range
l
What version of Cassandra are you using ?
> 2.9G of the heap is consumed by a JMXConfigurableThreadPoolExecutor that
> appears to be full of batch mutations.
That sounds like writes were backing up and/or blocked for some reason. Check
the logs for errors.
Notetool tpstats will show you if muta
I'm modeling a new application and considering the use of SuperColumn vs.
Composite Column paradigms. I understand that SuperColumns are discouraged
in new development, but I'm pondering a query where it seems like
SuperColumns might be better suited.
Consider a CF with SuperColumn layout as follo
Hi Sergey,
That was exactly it, thank you!
-Ben
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Sergey Tryuber wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> We've seen similar behavior once a time. The cause was unsynchronized time
> on the nodes. So I can recommend to check that system time is equal over
> the nodes (especially
I just started learning Cassandra any suggestion where to start with ??
Thanks
Soumya
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Roshni Rajagopal <
roshni_rajago...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I want to learn how we can model a mix of static and dynamic columns in
> a family.
>
> Consider a course_students c
I want to learn how we can model a mix of static and dynamic columns in a
family.
Consider a course_students col family which gives a list of students for a
coursewith row key- Course IdColumns - Name, Teach_Nm, StudID1, StudID2,
StudID3Values - Maths, Prof. Abc, 20,21,25 where 20,21,25 are IDs
Thanks Peter.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Peter Schuller
wrote:
>> changing it on some of them. Can I just change that value through the
>> cli and restart or are there any concerns I should have before trying
>> to tweak that parameter?
>
> You can change it, you don't have to restart. It
I didn't get a response to this, so I'll give it another shot. I tweaked some
parameters and cleaned up my schema.
My Hadoop/Cassandra job got further, but still dies with an OOM error. This
time, the heap dump displays
a JMXConfigurableThradPoolExecutor with a retained heap of 7.5G. I presume th
Hi,
we have been running a system on Cassandra 0.7 heavily relying on secondary
indexes for columns with TTL.
This has been working like a charm, but we are trying hard to move forward with
Cassandra and are struggling at that point:
When we put our data into a new cluster (any 1.1.x version -
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Janne Jalkanen
wrote:
> OK, so what's the worst case here? Data loss? Bad performance?
Low performance is for sure a side effect. I can't comment on data
loss (and I'm curious about as well) because it depends on how data
off of an out-of-order sstable was being i
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Bryan Talbot wrote:
> To answer my own question: yes, the error is fatal. This also means that
> upgrades to 1.1.x from 1.0.x MUST use 1.0.11 or greater it seems to be
> successful.
>
> My test upgrade from 1.0.9 to 1.1.5 left the cluster in a state that wasn't
>
Hi Ben,
We've seen similar behavior once a time. The cause was unsynchronized time
on the nodes. So I can recommend to check that system time is equal over
the nodes (especially on that one "bad" server).
On 13 September 2012 05:15, Ben Frank wrote:
> Hey all,
>I'm setting up a new ring on
15 matches
Mail list logo