We did some benchmarking as well.
http://blog.vcider.com/2011/09/virtual-networks-can-run-cassandra-up-to-60-faster/
Although we were primarily interested in the networking issues
CM
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jeremy Hanna
wrote:
> This might be helpful:
> http://techblog.netflix.c
This might be helpful:
http://techblog.netflix.com/2011/11/benchmarking-cassandra-scalability-on.html
On Dec 30, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Dom Wong wrote:
> Hi, could anyone tell me whether this is possible with Cassandra using an
> appropriately sized EC2 cluster.
>
> 100,000 clients writing 50k each
Hi, could anyone tell me whether this is possible with Cassandra using an
appropriately sized EC2 cluster.
100,000 clients writing 50k each to their own specific row at 5 second
intervals?
How can I rename a column family (if version matters, I'm interested in
both 0.8.x and 1.0.x).
Thanks,
Jim
as per the wiki link you sent, i change my query to:
get user where something = '1';
Still throws the error ... This was fine *before* I ran the update CF
command ..
To Query Data
get User where age = '12';
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Moshiur Rahman wrote:
> I think you need to mention da
I think you need to mention data type in your command. You have to run the
following command first:
assume <*CFName*> keys as <*TypeName*, i.e., utf8>
Otherwise, you need to mention type with each command, e.g.,
utf8('keyname').
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/CassandraCli
Moshiur
On Fri, Dec
Hi Everyone,
Been a while .. without any problems. Thanks for grinding out a good
product! On 1.0.6, I applied an update to a column family to add a
secondary index, and now via the CLI, when I perform a "get user where
something=1" I receive the following result:
org.apache.cassandra.db.marsha
Hello,
Running a combination of 0.8.6 and 0.8.8 with RF=3, I am getting the
following while repairing one node (all other nodes completed successfully).
Can I just stop the instance, erase the SSTable and restart cleanup ?
Thanks
ERROR [Thread-402484] 2011-12-29 14:51:03,687 AbstractCassandraDaemo
I currently have
scf[c1][sc1]=value
scf[c1][sc2]=value
...
scf[c2][sc1]=value
scf[c2][sc2]=value
scf[c2][sc3]=value
scf[c2][sc4]=value
99% of the time, I do multiget super slices: for multiple keys, I query for
columns explicitly c1,c2,c10,c12
1% of the time, I do a multigetrange superslice where
