Re: [D] A new home for pyarrow-stubs? [arrow]

GitHub user AlenkaF added a comment to the discussion: A new home for pyarrow-stubs? Thank you for opening up this discussion! There is a general consensus on the need for type annotations in PyArrow. In my opinion, the main challenge to progress is the lack of agreement on the approach to t

Re: api gateway with arrow flight grpc

I had a checkout of the arrow monorepo [1] and the file is at ./format/Flight.proto [2]. [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/ [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/format/Flight.proto On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 5:40 PM Z A wrote: > > Hi Bryce, > Thanks for the reply. Where can i get the pat

Re: [D] [Python] Not able to decrypt the parquet file encrypted using c++ arrow code [arrow]

GitHub user adamreeve added a comment to the discussion: [Python] Not able to decrypt the parquet file encrypted using c++ arrow code Hi @basu45. In your C++ example you are directly setting a footer key using the low-level encryption API. This isn't compatible with PyArrow, which only expose

Re: [D] A new home for pyarrow-stubs? [arrow]

GitHub user yangdanny97 added a comment to the discussion: A new home for pyarrow-stubs? Thanks for the context! If there isn't a strong consensus on inline types, I'd probably recommend the types be kept as stubs (with some tools like [stubtest](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/stubtes

Re: [D] A new home for pyarrow-stubs? [arrow]

GitHub user raulcd added a comment to the discussion: A new home for pyarrow-stubs? Thanks for opening the discussion @yangdanny97 and thanks for the links @AlenkaF , really useful to get the history around it! I've closed: - https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/30426 As a duplicate of: -