RE: Problems with ANTLR

2013-08-11 Thread Ernst Reissner
Hi all, I have a similar problem receiving /home/ernst/Software/build.xml:352: Problem: failed to create task or type antlib:org/apache/tools/ant/antlr:ant-antlr3 Cause: The name is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check

Re: AW: Problems with ANTLR

2013-08-18 Thread Ernst Reissner
sspath see > http://ant.apache.org/manual/Types/antlib.html#loadFromInside > > Jan > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Ernst Reissner [mailto:[hidden email] > ] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. August 2013 15:16 > > An: [hidden email] > > Betreff: R

Re: AW: Problems with ANTLR

2013-08-18 Thread Ernst Reissner
; task > to find out the proper way to set it up. > > Matt > On Aug 18, 2013 10:48 AM, "Ernst Reissner" <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > > Hello Jan, > > you mean that ant-antlr3.jar is not in place? > > I have it in /usr/share/ant/lib > > and e

Re: AW: Problems with ANTLR

2013-08-19 Thread Ernst Reissner
e in this manner, hence my confusion. :-( > > Matt > On Aug 18, 2013 5:44 PM, "Ernst Reissner" <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > > H, > > what I read is > > http://www.antlr.org/wiki/display/ANTLR3/How+to+use+ant+with+ANTLR3 > > > >

Re: AW: AW: Problems with ANTLR

2013-08-19 Thread Ernst Reissner
Hi Jan, i tried >name="ant-antlr3" > classname="org.apache.tools.ant.antlr.ANTLR3" > /> as you suggested (which looks much better than what i did before). Result ernst@localhost:~/Software> ant genParser Buildfile: /home/ernst/Software/build.xml BUILD FAILED /home/ernst/Software/

Re: AW: AW: Problems with ANTLR

2013-08-19 Thread Ernst Reissner
Ok, got one step further: now i have: which seems to work. But when i try to use the new task by ant complaints ernst@localhost:~/Software> ant genParser Buildfile: /home/ernst/Software/build.xml init: genParser: BUILD FAILED /home/erns

Re: AW: AW: Problems with ANTLR

2013-08-20 Thread Ernst Reissner
st > See inline for some commentary: > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Ernst Reissner <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > > Ok, got one step further: > > now i have: > > > > > > > > > > > > >