Dmonique,
On Monday 17 January 2005 21:12, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > From: Paul Elschot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Is it possible to fork junit itself, instead of each test case?
>
> Try with Ant 1.6.2. --DD
I upgraded ant from 1.6b2 to 1.6, and according to the docs the
above forkmode s
This is due to a
Matthew Nelson wrote:
I'm having some difficulty creating unions of PropertySets for a
series of subprojects in my build ... even when I copy the sample code
directly from the Ant documentation! It just doesn't work. Am I doing
something naively wrong, or is this a problem with
committed, should appear on the Ant site shortly.
I'm not sure whether "Related Project" wouldn't be a better fit than
"External Tasks", though.
Cheers
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
committed, should appear on the Ant site shortly.
I'm not sure whether "Related Project" wouldn't be a better fit than
"External Tasks", though.
Cheers
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
Hello, Paul,
--- Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I upgraded ant from 1.6b2 to 1.6, and according to
> the docs the
> above forkmode should do what I need.
>
> For the moment the compilation of the test code
> fails, because
> the junit.framework package does not exist for the
> compil
Hello,
I have a quick question;
I need to extend the tools=2Eant=2ETask so that i can call a specific task
from the build.Exml file.
I have been able to call the task by the task at the
command line i.e. ant -test which runs something like this
This executes the class MyVeryOwnTa
Hey Guys (and gals),
I am having some trouble with trying to use antcall with input tasks.
See attached build file (called whats_up.xml).
The two targets that don't work (realwork1 and realwork2) both use helper targets that use tasks to invoke the tasks, while the third target (realwork3)
Properties set in the target run by do not get passed back to
the calling target. I would suggest you investigate antcontrib's
AntCallBack task:
http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/tasks/antcallback_task.html
JEC
--
Jeffrey E. Care ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WebSphere Build SWAT Team Lead
WebSphere B
Ops...
I had forgetten about the behavior, thanks for the reminder...
Ninju
Jeffrey E Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Properties set in the target run by do not get passed back to
the calling target. I would suggest you investigate antcontrib's
AntCallBack task:
http://ant-contrib.sourc
Domique, Ivan,
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:55, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
> --- Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I upgraded ant from 1.6b2 to 1.6, and according to
> > the docs the
> > above forkmode should do what I need.
> >
> > For the moment the compilation of the tes
Hi,
I'm having a problem running a small test program that calls
DocumentBuilderFactor.newInstance() and prints out the name
of the actual factory class.
If I run it by invoking java (1.5) directly on the commandline,
it works fine and reports the factory as:
factory is: com.sun.org.apache.xerces.i
The ClearCase "ccupdate" task writes too much to the standard output. I
can't seem to stop it from printing each directory in the update. The
ClearCase ccupdate task is ultimately implemented as a command-line exec, so
it seems that ant doesn't control the output. I'm wondering if this notion
i
Specify a log file to write to with the log attribute. Does that silence the
noise? If not, I have recently written some ClearCase output handling classes
for an lsco fileset selector that may be usefull. Let me know.
-Rob Anderson
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Johannesson [mailt
Thanks for your reply. The output occurs whether or not the "log" attribute
is specified. The output is a list of each directory processed by the
update. The log file is more of a summary. We have no problem with the log
file. We just want to suppress the other output.
From: "Anderson, Rob (Glo
14 matches
Mail list logo
