Umask is a shell command, not a standalone binary. So you will need to
invoke your shell to run umask. Something like
On Aug 2, 2012 4:57 PM, "Maurice Feskanich"
wrote:
> Looks like it needs the full path to the executable.
>
> Maury
>
>
> On 08/02/12 13:36, Eric Fetzer wrote:
>
>> Sorry, a
Thanks everyone, moved over to chmod.
On Aug 2, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:00:11 +, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> ...
>> If you still can't find it, change the executable to start your shell
>> and tell it to execute the umask command. Something like this:
>>
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:00:11 +, Bruce Atherton wrote:
...
> If you still can't find it, change the executable to start your shell
> and tell it to execute the umask command. Something like this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
Problem is: This will work, but won't work as expected. The umask it
Which might be a problem on some systems, as sometimes umask is a
built-in shell command.
Commands to find out where umask is: "which umask", "type umask".
Even if it is built in to the shell, it may still be available as an
executable on your system. Try looking in /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, and
Looks like it needs the full path to the executable.
Maury
On 08/02/12 13:36, Eric Fetzer wrote:
Sorry, ant version is 1.7.1
On Aug 2, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Eric Fetzer wrote:
I don't get it, I do the following and it crashes:
Anyone have a clue why that would be? I'm
Sorry, ant version is 1.7.1
On Aug 2, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Eric Fetzer wrote:
> I don't get it, I do the following and it crashes:
>
>
>
>
>
> Anyone have a clue why that would be? I'm on redhat 5.5 (Tikanga). I can
> type umask 0002 on the command line all day long... He
I don't get it, I do the following and it crashes:
Anyone have a clue why that would be? I'm on redhat 5.5 (Tikanga). I can type
umask 0002 on the command line all day long... Here's the error:
/app/rosstr/test.xml:5: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run progra
