Re: stcheckout on

2010-06-14 Thread Eric Fetzer
eates the first folder, tries to create the second folder and crashes because it created the first with 666 perms. So it appears that stcheckout is rather jacked up in unix. From: reno To: Ant Users List Sent: Fri, June 11, 2010 12:57:45 PM Subject: Re: stch

Re: stcheckout on

2010-06-11 Thread reno
shes because it created the first with 666 perms. So it appears that stcheckout is rather jacked up in unix. From: reno To: Ant Users List Sent: Fri, June 11, 2010 12:57:45 PM Subject: Re: stcheckout on Eric Fetzer wrote: When using stcheckout recursivel

Re: stcheckout on

2010-06-11 Thread Eric Fetzer
: Ant Users List Sent: Fri, June 11, 2010 12:57:45 PM Subject: Re: stcheckout on Eric Fetzer wrote: > When using stcheckout recursively in Linux, I'm getting a folder created with > permissions of 666, and thus, it can't checkout anything below the folder out > because it

Re: stcheckout on

2010-06-11 Thread reno
Eric Fetzer wrote: When using stcheckout recursively in Linux, I'm getting a folder created with permissions of 666, and thus, it can't checkout anything below the folder out because it doesn't have permissions. Any way to say check out and give files / folders ??? perms? Eric,

stcheckout on

2010-06-10 Thread Eric Fetzer
When using stcheckout recursively in Linux, I'm getting a folder created with permissions of 666, and thus, it can't checkout anything below the folder out because it doesn't have permissions.  Any way to say check out and give files / folders ??? perms?