Re: macrodef and uri

2006-06-09 Thread Scot P. Floess
Peter: Thanks for the reply... I had found the answer shortly after I posted...For some reason it never "clicked" about adding the namespace at the level...I sorta felt silly once I realized that ;) Regardless, I appreciate you responding...thanks again :) Scot Peter Reilly wrote: In par

Re: macrodef and uri

2006-06-09 Thread Peter Reilly
In particular a uri is not a namespace prefix. One needs to map a prefix to a uri using the xmlns attribute. Hello world Peter On 6/8/06, Scot P. Floess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, someone feel free to kick me and call me a newbie! I found my problem...

Re: macrodef and uri

2006-06-08 Thread Scot P. Floess
OK, someone feel free to kick me and call me a newbie! I found my problem... I didn't define the namespace in the Regardless...disregard! Scot P. Floess wrote: I am trying to find some examples using a uri on macrodef... My assumption was, if I used a uri, I could use that to prefix using t

macrodef and uri

2006-06-08 Thread Scot P. Floess
I am trying to find some examples using a uri on macrodef... My assumption was, if I used a uri, I could use that to prefix using the macrodef itself... For instance: ... ... But that does not seem to work (as in I get an error)... I found a link regarding this as being a bug but could