Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote:
There is to check for ports, but no "while". I would suggest
using and write it in a code.
There is , that blocks until a condition is met
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yea...thats what i am doing now :)...Seems easier that
way
Thanks much
K
--- David Weintraub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not write a shell script and then have the shell
> script execute
> the loop? All the task would have to do is
> execute the shell
> script. The shell script can return a
Why not write a shell script and then have the shell script execute
the loop? All the task would have to do is execute the shell
script. The shell script can return a non-zero exit code on failure.
On 5/24/07, Krish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have a requirement wherein I need to make sure
Please also look for task in this mailing list.
- Alexey.
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote:
There is to check for ports, but no "while". I would suggest
using and write it in a code.
- Alexey.
Krish wrote:
Hi
I have a requirement wherein I need to make sure the process doesnt
exist. So I nee
There is to check for ports, but no "while". I would suggest
using and write it in a code.
- Alexey.
Krish wrote:
Hi
I have a requirement wherein I need to make sure the
process doesnt exist. So I need to do something like
this -
`netstat -tln | grep 8080 | cut -f1 -d'.
If the return va
I may be being a bit picky but I would not key on a port (which could
change in a config file) I would target the process name itself with ps
or pgrep myself.
I haven't done any serious ant dev in a while (my build scripts work
fine =) but if you have exhausted the core and contrib tasks then
Hi
I have a requirement wherein I need to make sure the
process doesnt exist. So I need to do something like
this -
`netstat -tln | grep 8080 | cut -f1 -d'.
If the return value of the above is tcp, then i know
that a process is running . I need to run this
command in a loop until the proces
