Hi, Martin
sorry for my late response, had been out of office ...
/*
my usages looks like the following:
In the above, d seems to get called twice.
*/
that looks logical as e depends on d and afterwards you're
calling target d agai
On 1/5/07, Rebhan, Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
can you give a short snippet to illustrate your problem ?
i use limit like that and it works fine =
put all my stuff that should be killed
if not in time, f.e.
...
...
if there are any sideeffects with your targets and antca
tself.
Regards, Gilbert
-Original Message-
From: martin sweitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:04 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: target timeout
On 12/22/06, martin sweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/22/06, Gilbert Rebhan <[EMAIL
On 12/22/06, martin sweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/22/06, Gilbert Rebhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> martin sweitzer wrote:
> > Is there a way to have a timeout associated with a ?
> > I would like to put an upper bound on the time a target can run. I
>
> you can go with the
On 12/22/06, Gilbert Rebhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
martin sweitzer wrote:
> Is there a way to have a timeout associated with a ?
> I would like to put an upper bound on the time a target can run. I
you can go with the task from antcontrib
see = http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/tas
Hi,
martin sweitzer wrote:
Is there a way to have a timeout associated with a ?
I would like to put an upper bound on the time a target can run. I
you can go with the task from antcontrib
see = http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/tasks/tasks/limit_task.html
Regards, Gilbert
