On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:05 PM 1/11/2007, you wrote:
>>I'm not sure whether it is going to stay that way or whether we make
>>JUnit optional again in the future, but for Ant 1.7.0, JUnit is
>>required.
>
> If JUnit is now required, shouldn't 1.7.x then s
At 11:05 PM 1/11/2007, you wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Bruce Bushby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The build fails saying "We cannot build the test jar unless JUnit is
>> present" I've gone through the docs, specifically the "Installing
>> Ant/Building Ant" but can't find an explanation for wher
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Bruce Bushby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The build fails saying "We cannot build the test jar unless JUnit is
> present" I've gone through the docs, specifically the "Installing
> Ant/Building Ant" but can't find an explanation for where I'm going
> wrong?
Even if you don't
