Ahhh, that makes perfect sense
Thanks for shedding some light on the subject.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Hatton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 4:11 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: War update = true
-Original Message-
>> So when
-Original Message-
>> So when is war/uptodate="true" valuable (or
>> zip/jar/war/ear for that
>> matter)?
>>
>Ya got me. ;) Maybe when you just want to add files
>to an archive and they don't all exist in an
>uncompressed form? Otherwise, someone might just have
>a preference to update
--- "Ciramella, EJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So when is war/uptodate="true" valuable (or
> zip/jar/war/ear for that
> matter)?
>
Ya got me. ;) Maybe when you just want to add files
to an archive and they don't all exist in an
uncompressed form? Otherwise, someone might just have
a preferenc
So when is war/uptodate="true" valuable (or zip/jar/war/ear for that
matter)?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:48 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: War update = true
--- "Ciramella, EJ" <[EMAIL P
--- "Ciramella, EJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that the war task with the
> update="true" setting
> takes longer than simply recreating the war?
>
> On average, it's 10 - 15 seconds faster to build the
> war from scratch than
> to update it. Am I missing a setting somewh