RE: War update = true

2004-02-25 Thread Ciramella, EJ
Ahhh, that makes perfect sense Thanks for shedding some light on the subject. -Original Message- From: Keith Hatton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 4:11 AM To: Ant Users List Subject: RE: War update = true -Original Message- >> So when

RE: War update = true

2004-02-25 Thread Keith Hatton
-Original Message- >> So when is war/uptodate="true" valuable (or >> zip/jar/war/ear for that >> matter)? >> >Ya got me. ;) Maybe when you just want to add files >to an archive and they don't all exist in an >uncompressed form? Otherwise, someone might just have >a preference to update

RE: War update = true

2004-02-24 Thread Matt Benson
--- "Ciramella, EJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So when is war/uptodate="true" valuable (or > zip/jar/war/ear for that > matter)? > Ya got me. ;) Maybe when you just want to add files to an archive and they don't all exist in an uncompressed form? Otherwise, someone might just have a preferenc

RE: War update = true

2004-02-24 Thread Ciramella, EJ
So when is war/uptodate="true" valuable (or zip/jar/war/ear for that matter)? -Original Message- From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:48 PM To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: War update = true --- "Ciramella, EJ" <[EMAIL P

Re: War update = true

2004-02-24 Thread Matt Benson
--- "Ciramella, EJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that the war task with the > update="true" setting > takes longer than simply recreating the war? > > On average, it's 10 - 15 seconds faster to build the > war from scratch than > to update it. Am I missing a setting somewh