Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-02 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I'm back at work and the diagnostics switch worked as expected. I redirected standard out to a file so I could examine it more easily. On my computer (one that does use the XSLT engine I specified) the result showed an XML section that described the XML parser, but

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-02 Thread Steve Loughran
Dominique Devienne wrote: Frankly, using C:\Program Files doesn't suit me, because it's too long. To type, to look at, in paths, etc... A Jar files is often not really an application, but a component to be used by an actual application. Windows puts its component in C:\WINNT\**. There's no right

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Dominique Devienne
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:36:22 +0100 To: "Ant Users List" Subject: Re: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread cknell
Re: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Dominique Devienne
Frankly, using C:\Program Files doesn't suit me, because it's too long. To type, to look at, in paths, etc... A Jar files is often not really an application, but a component to be used by an actual application. Windows puts its component in C:\WINNT\**. There's no right and wrong place to put thin

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Ron Wheeler
I prefer to put it in the place selected by the software manufacturer and then define Java_home with 8.3 so that the slightly broken tools that I use can still work. \Program Files\ should be the "Power Users" choice since it is supposed to be the location of all software packages under Window

Re: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Dominique Devienne
Why more people did not notice this I have no idea! Simply because most developers and/or power-user on Windows don't install Java-related stuff in C:\Program Files, precisely to avoid such errors. --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Peter Reilly
Aug 2006 08:44:40 -0400 > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

RE: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread cknell
-Original Message- > From: Ron Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:44:40 -0400 > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Ron Wheeler
What does Ant -diagnostics say now [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I'm back at work and the diagnostics switch worked as expected. I redirected standard out to a file so I could examine it more easily. On my computer (one that does use the XSLT engine I specified) the result showed an XML sectio

RE: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread cknell
on of XSLT. Where am I to look for this information? -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:06:01 +0100 To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Ron Wheeler
You might find that changing \Program Files\ to the DOS 8.3 name (usually PROGRA~1) might help You can find the DOS 8.3 name for a directory using DIR /X from the DOS Command prompt. Change the environment variables that ANT might use, in this case JAVA_HOME, to use the DOS 8.3 paths. Ron

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-08-01 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm at home now and not at work. I haven't used Ant on this computer before. I opened a Windows command-line, switched to the Ant\bin directory and typed "ant -diagnostics" at the prompt. The result was this: Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_06\bin was unexpected at this time. Wha

RE: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-07-31 Thread cknell
ve I done wrong here? -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:14:41 +0100 To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

Re: Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-07-31 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having a problem with choosing an XSLT processor to use with the

Problem choosing XSLT processer with

2006-07-31 Thread cknell
I'm having a problem with choosing an XSLT processor to use with the