Re: Performance of Ant

2009-10-02 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
Oops.. It is nice to know that ant-contrib already has it. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-Ant-%3Cantcall%3E-tp25676250p25716730.html Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com

RE: Performance of Ant

2009-10-02 Thread Rebhan, Gilbert
-Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 3:25 PM To: user@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance of Ant /* On 2009-10-02, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: > I have put the summary of discussion and need for a new task as per t

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-10-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-10-02, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: > I have put the summary of discussion and need for a new task as per this > discussions in ant-contrib. I think you've misunderstood what I was trying to say. ant-contrib already has such a task:

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-10-02 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-Ant-%3Cantcall%3E-tp25676250p25714572.html Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-10-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-10-02, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: >> I will note that the ant-contrib project provides a task to invoke a >> target. > O.k, thanks. Do I need to post this in ant-contrib forum. If you have question about ant-contrib's task(s), then their forum will be better suited than this list, yes.

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-10-02 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
> Ant's goal is to be declarative in nature. O.k > I will note that the ant-contrib project provides a task to invoke a > target. O.k, thanks. Do I need to post this in ant-contrib forum. Regards, Nagendra -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-10-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-10-02, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: > This could be one workaround due to lack of straight approach to call the > target. > I am surprised why such a thing did not exist from day one.. Pl. let me know > if this approach has any ant design related issues. Any ability to call directly makes

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-10-01 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
doesn't work for macrodef-ed or > presetdef-ed tasks - this is true. > > Stefan > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org > > > -- View this me

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-09-30, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: > Yes, I could but I loose the flexibility of calling from command line. original-content-of-your-target should work for that usecase. > To our surprise.. when such a changes are done, they work from xml but it > does not work cust

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-09-30 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-Ant-%3Cantcall%3E-tp25676250p25677907.html Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance of Ant

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-09-30, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: > On a professional product build scripts, we see the need for calling many > times to call a particular target. However due to isolation level > for this target calls.. there is a huge penalty on performance. > Is there a way to call another target in

Performance of Ant

2009-09-30 Thread Raja Nagendra Kumar
which does exactly this. Regards, Raja Nagendra Kumar, C.T.O www.tejasoft.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-of-Ant-%3Cantcall%3E-tp25676250p25676250.html Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com