On 2011-11-09, Steve Amerige wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. This won't work because the macrodef won't
> have any knowledge of what to do as per my need.
I have to trust you on that.
> I think, therefore, my solution of having 2 macrodef elements is as
> close as I can get:
>
> ...
> ...
>
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your reply. This won't work because the macrodef won't have any knowledge of what to do as per my need. I think,
therefore, my solution of having 2 macrodef elements is as close as I can get:
...
...
So, then the question shifts a bit: in a macrodef, assuming that an
On 2011-11-08, Steve Amerige wrote:
> I'd like to do something like:
>
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>...
>
> Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and
> other places it returns false. I want the solution to be wholly in
> Ant (no Java, Groo
e
in and use AntContrib though, since it gives you an task.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Amerige [mailto:steve.amer...@sas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 9:46 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Macrodef and If
I'd like to do something like:
...
.amer...@sas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 9:46 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Macrodef and If
I'd like to do something like:
...
...
Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and other
places it returns fals
I'd like to do something like:
...
...
Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and other places it returns false. I want the solution to be wholly
in Ant (no Java, Groovy, external file use, etc.).
Is it possible? If so, can y
