Re: Changing regex implementation in LineContainsRegExp filter

OH, I overlooked the fact that linecontainsregexp returns a whole line. I guess I could reduce my regex to " wrote: Have you tried putting t

Re: Changing regex implementation in LineContainsRegExp filter

I don't think so. What do you suggest? I just want to get the value of the src attributes from all the script tags. Alex On 7/19/07, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have you tried putting the ORO impl in ANT_HOME/lib? But isn't you regexp more complex that it needs to be? --DD

Re: Changing regex implementation in LineContainsRegExp filter

Have you tried putting the ORO impl in ANT_HOME/lib? But isn't you regexp more complex that it needs to be? --DD On 7/19/07, Alex Egg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By default it looks like the LineContainsRegExp filter uses the java.util.regex package by default. However, apparently this particula

Changing regex implementation in LineContainsRegExp filter

By default it looks like the LineContainsRegExp filter uses the java.util.regex package by default. However, apparently this particular regex implementation doesn't support * metacharacters in look-behinds, e.g.: (?<=\