Ahh, sorry. I just found the "uptodate" directive. I've done:
And all seems to be well.
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 8:19 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> If you're referring to Java compilation, tools like Ant and Maven
>> generally perform
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> If you're referring to Java compilation, tools like Ant and Maven
> generally perform incremental compilation unless explicitly forced to
> do otherwise, such as by "cleaning" (deleting) existing classfiles
> from a previous compilation
ing cutting-edge support for
the formats below.
/hth/
martin
__
From: Matt Benson
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 7:34 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: Ant Dependency Management
If you're referring to Java
If you're referring to Java compilation, tools like Ant and Maven
generally perform incremental compilation unless explicitly forced to
do otherwise, such as by "cleaning" (deleting) existing classfiles
from a previous compilation.
HTH,
Matt
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 5:17 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Hello
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 5:17 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Is it possible to cache compilation results? I would like to avoid
> lengthy compile times after changing one file.
What I do for these situations is have the task create an empty file
which can then be used on subsequent executions for a modtime c
Hello,
When referring to Makefiles, dependencies are rules that represent a
subset of the overall build. With Ant, I they seem to represent
external libraries, so I am having trouble researching my question.
Is it possible to cache compilation results? I would like to avoid
lengthy compile times
