cool, he? :-)
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 19:17
>An: Ant Users List
>Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Workaround for no failonerror
>
>--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>[SNIP]
>> m
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
> maybe a nested would be useful
>
> ...
>
> mmh javadoc [1,2] sais that it´s there ...
Wow, I didn't know anybody even used these in Ant
core, much less in extensions. How gratifying. ;)
-Matt
>
>
> Jan
>
>
>
> [1]
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 12:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dont know any of these tasks, so here are only 0.5ct :-)
>
>
> >Another good way to do this would be to enhance the tasks! I
> >was going to create a patch this weekend if I get the time. I
> >think my desired features for this are to al
I dont know any of these tasks, so here are only 0.5ct :-)
>Another good way to do this would be to enhance the tasks! I
>was going to create a patch this weekend if I get the time. I
>think my desired features for this are to allow a failonerror
>attribute and also a usefile attribute to send
I noticed the same irritation with the catalina ant tasks last week. I
did try to check whether a webapp was already deployed prior to calling
deploy, but I couldn't work out how to capture the output of the
Catalina List Task and parse the results for the existence of the
webapp. Any suggestions a
* Antcontrib
* Ant2 will never be written
* why you dont check for the existence of the webapp before undeploying?
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 12:31
>An: user@ant.apache.org
>Betreff: Workaroun
