Peter Reilly wrote:
On 1/4/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2)
>> The java api of some types in ant were not really designed for
>> ease of use.
>
> It's much easier to use instead of , e.g.
>
> Compare the execute()-implementation between [1] and [2].
On 1/4/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2)
>> The java api of some types in ant were not really designed for
>> ease of use.
>
> It's much easier to use instead of , e.g.
>
> Compare the execute()-implementation between [1] and [2].
>
>
ahh, but as of a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2)
The java api of some types in ant were not really designed for
ease of use.
It's much easier to use instead of , e.g.
Compare the execute()-implementation between [1] and [2].
ahh, but as of ant 1.7 everything is a resource, which is something you
can iterat
>2)
>The java api of some types in ant were not really designed for
>ease of use.
It's much easier to use instead of , e.g.
Compare the execute()-implementation between [1] and [2].
Jan
[1]
http://ant.apache.org/manual/tutorial-tasks-filesets-properties.html#fil
esets
[2]
http://ant.apache.
ok
project.getReference()
Jan
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 10:34
>An: Ant Users List
>Betreff: Re: AW: how
