AW: and s

2004-10-06 Thread Jan . Materne
> I think it's just a different design. > In mine the "common" build file already contains everything I > need for a > typical project out of the box. > The purpose of the including build file is just to add/rewrite/extend > custom stuff. For very basic projects it just adds a target > to pack

AW: and s

2004-10-06 Thread Jan . Materne
Maybe that´s historical: when writing that peace of code I tested the paths _inside_ the buildfile and then extracting that into common.xml :) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2004 16:46 > An: Ant User

Re: AW: and s

2004-10-06 Thread Peter Reilly
This will cause the annoying Overriding previous definition of reference to classpath.additional message. There is a bug report requesting the reduction of this message to verbose, perhaps this would be a good thing to do! Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yep: common.xml: ---

AW: and s

2004-10-06 Thread Jan . Materne
yep: common.xml: --- build.xml: -- Other than properties paths will be muted. Therefore the build.xml imports the additional classpath and overrides it after it (with properties you have to import after prop-settings). The