On 2011-11-09, Steve Amerige wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. This won't work because the macrodef won't
> have any knowledge of what to do as per my need.
I have to trust you on that.
> I think, therefore, my solution of having 2 macrodef elements is as
> close as I can get:
>
> ...
> ...
>
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your reply. This won't work because the macrodef won't have any knowledge of what to do as per my need. I think,
therefore, my solution of having 2 macrodef elements is as close as I can get:
...
...
So, then the question shifts a bit: in a macrodef, assuming that an
On 2011-11-08, Steve Amerige wrote:
> I'd like to do something like:
>
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>...
>
> Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and
> other places it returns false. I want the solution to be wholly in
> Ant (no Java, Groo
e
in and use AntContrib though, since it gives you an task.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Amerige [mailto:steve.amer...@sas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 9:46 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Macrodef and If
I'd like to do something like:
...
.amer...@sas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 9:46 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Macrodef and If
I'd like to do something like:
...
...
Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and other
places it returns fals
I'd like to do something like:
...
...
Within the macrodef, there would be places it would return true and other places it returns false. I want the solution to be wholly
in Ant (no Java, Groovy, external file use, etc.).
Is it possible? If so, can y
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
> Sent: 06 May 2010 04:39
> To: user@ant.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Better alternative than using foreach, for and
> if/then/else?
>
> On 2010-05-05, Bailey, Darragh wrote:
>
> >
On 2010-05-05, Bailey, Darragh wrote:
> 1) Is for/foreach the only real option for what I'm attempting to
> accomplish here in building multiple end targets based on the contents
> of properties?
I'd recommend writing a custom task for this rather than trying to
implement it in XML. Using Ant's
ous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> From: dbai...@hp.com
> To: user@ant.apache.org
> Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:10:41 +
> Subject: RE: Better alternative than using foreach, for and if/then/else?
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 05 May 2010 14:46
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: Re: Better alternative than using foreach, for and
> if/then/else?
>
> You need to use ant 1.8 and the task.
> declares
You need to use ant 1.8 and the task.
declares that a property is local to the current scope,
as defined by the enclosing or
see: http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/local.html
Have recently just started using Ant, with the goal to using it as the default
build tool across an entire project. While most of the project will be java
based, there are a few parts that won't be and I'm trying to make ant work as
effectively as possible for these sections.
One of them just
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message, and any
attachments, from your system. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:39 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: and if
Mark Modrall wrote
Mark Modrall wrote:
Online manual say supports if and unless but when I try to use
them, ant 1.7.0 says it doesn't.
where does it say that echo supports them? what is the url?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
Online manual say supports if and unless but when I try to use
them, ant 1.7.0 says it doesn't.
Thanks
_mark
This e-mail message, and any attachments, is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity identified in the alias address of this message and may
contain information that
15 matches
Mail list logo
