AW: , but for paths...

2006-02-15 Thread Jan.Materne
>This is great!!! I just take a look at both the code in svn >HEAD and in the docs and I saw it. Well, this means that I >have to revise the article for 1.7. Ask Steve - he is very happy to rewrite the book ;-) Especially if 1.7 is not fixed. So something which is ok for now could be impossibl

Re: , but for paths...

2006-02-15 Thread Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov
Hello Matt, --- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ivan, > I had never read your entire article Oh, you have missed one of the most important knowledge in the world :) > as my own tests > with Thread-based input obscuration yielded > less-than-satisfactory results some years ago; Hm, I mad

Re: , but for paths...

2006-02-15 Thread Patrick Martin
Hello, You may want to have a look to antform: http://antforms.sourceforge.net/ Regards, Patrick M. On 2/15/06, Rich Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was looking through the online Ant manual recently, looking for > something like , but which would display either an "open" or > "save" dial

Re: , but for paths...

2006-02-15 Thread Matt Benson
--- "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > I collected some more > information on ant's input handlers in an article > called "Extending Ant Input Abilties", which you can > find at [2]. > [SNIP] > [2]http://ant.apache.org/resources.html Ivan, I had never read your entire a

Re: , but for paths...

2006-02-15 Thread Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov
Hello, task does not read the user input. Instead it delegates the reading to InputHandlers [1]. In short you should write an extension of InputHandler and create the dialog in it. Then pass the fully qualified name of your input handler to -inputhandler option of ant launching script. I collecte

, but for paths...

2006-02-15 Thread Rich Wagner
I was looking through the online Ant manual recently, looking for something like , but which would display either an "open" or "save" dialog, i.e. what you typically see if you choose "File: Open..." or "File: Save..." in an application. Alas, I found no such task, so I instead wrote tasks and