Re: "available" shouldn't actually load the class; just see if it's resolvable

2004-11-09 Thread David Smiley
Peter Reilly wrote: David Smiley wrote: Does anyone want to offer their opinion? It should be an easy change and I think it would be very unlikely if this broke any existing builds. It will break some builds. Using the current method, the script knows that the class is present and useable, and

Re: "available" shouldn't actually load the class; just see if it's resolvable

2004-11-09 Thread David Smiley
Does anyone want to offer their opinion? It should be an easy change and I think it would be very unlikely if this broke any existing builds. ~ Dave David Smiley wrote: Hello. Recently I got the uddi4j source and I rant it's ant build script. It turns out that it would conditionally co

"available" shouldn't actually load the class; just see if it's resolvable

2004-10-29 Thread David Smiley
ad the class. Just see if the class is available by doing a getResource or something like that. ~ David Smiley MITRE - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]