javac debug option not working

Hi, I am using Ant 1.7.1 with JDK 1.5.0_09. I am building three JAR files. Source JAR, Classes JAR with -g and Classes JAR without -g. When I use these JARs with IDE and try to debug the source JAR, I am not able to do that

RE: Building with JDK 1.3. Which version of ANT?

Thanks for the quick response Stefan. That's the part I couldn't understand! I did set my java_home to jdk 1.3! And added %java_home%\bin to my windows path variable. I believe where Ant error msg is coming from is my java consol control panel pointing to jre 1.3 as I had unchecked and disab

Re: Building with JDK 1.3. Which version of ANT?

On 2009-07-30, Rez P wrote: > I'm going back in time and have to compile and old java project with > JDK 1.3. Currently I'm using Ant 1.7 and JDK 1.5 for all my > projects. So when I wrote a build.xml for the jdk 1.3 code and in > the compile target, using javac ant task, and set the 'source' or

Re: Problem with zip task

Oh, ClearCase. Each time we had similar problems we contacted our IT and they did some magic to fix it. I am happy to be [almost] Clear Case free now - there were so many things to go wrong and you cannot blame Rational/IBM for most of them, besides their architecture choices. If you need a qui

Macosx and AnsiColorLogger

Hi, The AnsiColorLogger described at (http://ant.apache.org/manual/listeners.html#AnsiColorLogger) does not work on the apple terminal the same way it does on linux terminals. All the color output I get is gray and I've tried looking up google but nothing turned up. However other console apps tha

Building with JDK 1.3. Which version of ANT?

Hi I'm going back in time and have to compile and old java project with JDK 1.3. Currently I'm using Ant 1.7 and JDK 1.5 for all my projects. So when I wrote a build.xml for the jdk 1.3 code and in the compile target, using javac ant task, and set the 'source' or 'target' attributes to 1.3

compare files line by line

Hello good people I am here again needing some help now I need to do a I script to compare two ".properties"..like First file Name: dev.properties @v...@=test1 @v...@=test2 @v...@=test3 Secund fiel Name: prd.properties # comment @v...@=test1 @v...@=test1037 @v...@=test4 I need to compare the

RE: Problem with zip task

I don't think this will be possible really. The filesystem is actually a clearcase snapshot view on that NAS...it gets a set of default permissions when the view is created/updated. -Original Message- From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:alexey.solofne...@symyx.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28,

RE: Problem with zip task

Yes, they are. -Original Message- From: Greg Roodt [mailto:gro...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 5:51 PM To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: Problem with zip task Out of interest, are archive.dir and staging.dir on the same filesystem? On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Scot P. Flo

Memory issue when using a lot of 'Ant' tasks.

Hey, Hey, I've written a task that repeatedly calls the 'Ant' task to execute another target. (The number of times that target is called Depends on the size of a given FileSet). The problem is that I get an OutOfMemory error. Wanted to ask if the following code looks suspicious to anyone. If n

Re: annotations are only available if source level is 5.0

Interesting... If you are running 1.6.0_0 - there should be absolutely no reason @Override is failing compilation... That is, unless your task has a target/source attribute of 1.4 or less... For example: You will need to search for build.xml or something like it to find the task call..

Re: annotations are only available if source level is 5.0

There should be a build.xml somewhere in the project. Probably /tmp/OpenbravoERP-2.50MP2/src-db/build in your case, but Im not familiar with this project/product. Inside the build.xml there will be an Ant target with a "javac" task. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:15 PM, jann1 wrote: > Scot P. Flo

Re: annotations are only available if source level is 5.0

Scot P. Floess schrieb: Which version of Java do you have on your system? If its stock 1.5+ it should just work without using the target attribute... java version 1.6.0_0 If all else fails I believe you can just do this: where to this

Re: annotations are only available if source level is 5.0

Oops - yeah include the source attribute too :) On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Greg Roodt wrote: Try this: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, jann1 wrote: Hello all, opensuse11.1, openbravoERP-250MP2: ant install.source produces the following error: compile: [javac] Compiling 1 source file

Re: annotations are only available if source level is 5.0

Try this: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, jann1 wrote: > Hello all, > opensuse11.1, openbravoERP-250MP2: > ant install.source produces the following error: > > compile: >[javac] Compiling 1 source file to > /tmp/OpenbravoERP-2.50MP2/src-db/build/classes >[javac] -- >

Re: annotations are only available if source level is 5.0

Which version of Java do you have on your system? If its stock 1.5+ it should just work without using the target attribute... If all else fails I believe you can just do this: Hello all, opensuse11.1, openbravoERP-250MP2: ant install.source produces the following error: compile: [j

RE: problem with macrodef in ant

The only real exploration I did was to review your code ;) When I saw the blocks and how you were using them in the task it just seemed you were trying to use properties like variables - that is why I initially mentioned Ant Contrib's task... I took a closer look and saw your intent - the

annotations are only available if source level is 5.0

Hello all, opensuse11.1, openbravoERP-250MP2: ant install.source produces the following error: compile: [javac] Compiling 1 source file to /tmp/OpenbravoERP-2.50MP2/src-db/build/classes [javac] -- [javac] 1. ERROR in /tmp/OpenbravoERP-2.50MP2/src-db/src/com/openbravo/db

RE: problem with macrodef in ant

Hi Scot P. Floess, I changed according to ur suggestion. It worked. Can u alloborate your exploration for the below two code blocks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> classname="org.apache.cxf.tools.wsdlto.WSDLToJava" fork="yes"> > >