RE: Re: macrodef and classpath

2009-02-06 Thread cknell
The variable is defined in the build.xml file. The only thing the macrodef file needs to have in advance in the name of the attribute, not the value. -- Charles Knell ckn...@onebox.com - email -Original Message- From: Mark Waschkowski Sent: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:28:38 -0500 To:

Re: macrodef and classpath

2009-02-06 Thread Mark Waschkowski
Hi, Thanks, but no. I have my macrodefs stored in one file, and I import it in the 'real' build file like so: I want to pass in my 'real' build properties to the macrodefs without defining values in the macrodef file. This works using elements, but not with attributes - am I missing something?

RE: macrodef and classpath

2009-02-06 Thread cknell
I set up properties in the "init" target and use references to them in the macrodefs. Here's an example I then refer to the property in the macrodef ex.

macrodef and classpath

2009-02-06 Thread Mark Waschkowski
Hi all, First time poster, hi! Thanks to the devs for ant, been using it for years now. I tried to do something new by creating a macrodef, but ran into some problems with passing in a classpath, and didn't see any solutions having gone through the mailing list archive. I've created a separate file

AW: Trouble with simple for loops

2009-02-06 Thread Jan.Materne
You can use both ... When using namespaces use autoloading the antlib. But you can also load the antlib in the old way Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Steve Liu [mailto:stevec...@gmail.com] >Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2009 14:25 >An: Ant Users List >Betreff: Re

Re: Trouble with simple for loops

2009-02-06 Thread Steve Liu
sorry to belabor the point, but I think I'm still not quite getting it: >No, thats right. >If you want to use you have to have Ant 1.6 or higher (like >current 1.7.1). > e.g. works with older Ant versions (like 1.5). But I can't use but only , right? I understand that the difference is just the