I would try with nested ...
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Ephi Sachs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 17:14
>An: user@ant.apache.org
>Betreff: Loading list of files
>
>How can I concat an ordered specific list of files, without
>hardcodng the li
Hi ,
I want to know how to use ant font manager.
Plz help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is there any way to cause ANT to
>> 1) always invoke the default target
You could specify a _default_ target since early versions of Ant
(in former time you has to specify the default attribute of project
>> Is there any way to cause ANT to
>> 1) always invoke the default target
You could specify a _default_ target since early versions of Ant
(in former time you has to specify the default attribute of project).
This target is performed, if you dont specify an alternative while
invocation.
If you w
You don't need to use an task in this case. It is known how many times
the loop should run.
You could use a property to store the list of DDB Suffixes
And base the loop on this property using {mdb.suffix} to store the list:
-Original Message-
From: Clifton Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
I wouldn't suggest antcontrib. Instead I'd look at setting up the properties
specific to each generation run and then use a task like subant or something
with a fileset to execute the build against each individual property setup.
For example, using antcontrib task would implied the use of the
How can I concat an ordered specific list of files, without hardcodng
the list in the Ant script?
i.e. I would like to have a file which contains a list of the files to
be concatted,
and then read the list of files from this file and concat them.
Thanks,
Ephi
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Giroux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:18 AM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: How to use ANT as a command shell
>
> I'm attempting to develop platform neutral launch scripts using ANT.
The
> product currently has bin/nt an
> >That's given your basedir as a pathelement - how about giving it the
> >"testing" directory instead? Isn't that the base of the testing classes?
>
> But I think that is correct.
> The base dir is, say, xxx. The testing dir sits below this with tests that
> are in the testing package.
> So sitti
Ant is not intended to be used in this way. The fact that you can kind of
hack it together to work should not be taken as encouragement to do so.
You might want to read "Ant in Anger"
(http://ant.apache.org/ant_in_anger.html) before setting yourself on this
course.
JEC
--
Jeffrey E. Care ([EM
Phew, got there in the endthanks for the help.
cheers
Andy
_
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
---
Michael:
If you are using ant 1.6.0 or later, your default target can be defined as:
.xml
What exactly are you attempting to do?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Giroux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Dec 6, 2005 10:17 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: How to use ANT as a command shell
I'm at
> Hi Dominique, in Bug14941 we (you and me :) showed how to
> invoke Ant from inside a buildfile as usual java application.
Which just shows how quickly I forget now that my carreer seems to be
taking a C++ turn again! Yes, Ant can launch Ant itself thru of course. I knew that ;-)
We used Cruz'
I'm attempting to develop platform neutral launch scripts using ANT. The
product currently has bin/nt and bin/unix folders with shell scripts
specific to each platform. I would like to replace this with a single bin
folder containing ant scripts.
The main issue is that ANT treats command line ar
> >That's given your basedir as a pathelement - how about giving it the
> >"testing" directory instead? Isn't that the base of the
> testing classes?
>
> But I think that is correct.
> The base dir is, say, xxx. The testing dir sits below this
> with tests that are in the testing package.
> So
That's given your basedir as a pathelement - how about giving it the
"testing" directory instead? Isn't that the base of the testing classes?
But I think that is correct.
The base dir is, say, xxx. The testing dir sits below this with tests that
are in the testing package.
So sitting in my x
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Jon Skeet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 11:06
>An: Ant Users List
>Betreff: RE: JUnit task
>
>> > > so it seems the fileset bit works (finds the test) but
>> JUnit doesn't
>> >have
>> > > the classpath.
> > > so it seems the fileset bit works (finds the test) but
> JUnit doesn't
> >have
> > > the classpath.
> >
> >Simply because you didn't provide any ;-)
> >
> >You'd need a nested (within ) with at least your
> >"testing" directory, and any other jar(s) or directory(ies)
> required to
> >run
> so it seems the fileset bit works (finds the test) but JUnit doesn't
have
> the classpath.
Simply because you didn't provide any ;-)
You'd need a nested (within ) with at least your
"testing" directory, and any other jar(s) or directory(ies) required
to run the tests. --DD
At the danger o
18 matches
Mail list logo