AW: AW: Checking for avaliablity of file

gu_hrd.distrib present Jan > -UrsprÃngliche Nachricht- > Von: Pritesh saharey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 09:03 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: AW: Checking for avaliablity of file > > Thanks Jan for your quick

AW: Interesting behaviour

This is defined behaviour. Providing values via nested s has a major relevance than just "inheriting" values. Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: sebastian ssmoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 10. August 2004 18:23 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Interesting

Re: AW: Checking for avaliablity of file

Thanks Jan for your quick reply but I already used its not working, please suggest some other solution. pritu --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ? Jan > -UrsprÃngliche Nachricht- > Von: Pritesh saharey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 08:35 > An: [EMAIL

Interesting behaviour

hi, first: i am not subscribed to the list so please use "reply to all" or add my private email addr to the cc list - thx. i discovered the following interesting behaviour. i do not know whether it is "defined"/expected or a bug so i decided to ask :) i have two build scripts - a.xml -