Re: creating pl/sql package in sql task, only part of package lo aded

2003-02-11 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi Tony, I think what you say (that the change should be made to the existing SQL task, rather than creating a new task) makes sense. Maybe you should add your comments on this URL http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16945 This way, the ant committers will see your comments when they

Re: JAR annoyance from 12/12/2000

2003-02-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Andrew Goodnough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BUILD FAILED java.lang.NullPointerException at > org.apache.tools.zip.ZipOutputStream.finish(ZipOutputStream.java(Compiled > Code)) at IBM's JDK? Disable the JIT or upgrade to JDK >= 1.3.1.

AW: pingURL: A better way to start and stop application servers?

2003-02-11 Thread Jan . Materne
ASAIK there are plans (ideas? wishes?) on the Dev-List for realizing a async-option (or task) for , and . But I´m not sure - especially when it will be done. Jan Matèrne -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Philip Aston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 15:48

AW: Parsing task

2003-02-11 Thread Jan . Materne
I would use property files: If your third instruction is you can set default values which only have to be overwritten. Although you can load user specific propertyfiles. All together: Jan Matèrne -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Chris Reeves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

jspC optional task

2003-02-11 Thread Alain Renaud
It took me several hours to be able to use the task jspC in Ant, all of that because the documentation is so poor about it. On the surface, when you read it, it seems deceptively simple: copy/paste the example, change the paths and voila... except it's much more complicated than that. Having a rea

Re: FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Conor MacNeill
Keith Hatton wrote: I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me. If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam. Can the list owners please deal with this guy. Thanks I requested the user to be unsubscribed about 7 hours ago. I wa

Re: FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Tony Obermeit
Is it possible this is just because the ant list was recently changed to a different address? At 09:41 AM 11/02/2003 +, you wrote: I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me. If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam. Can

Réf. : Best Practices for J2EE Project DirectoryStructures

2003-02-11 Thread loic . lefevre
Take a look here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jboss/manual/src/guide/examples/template/ It is a template used for J2EE projects under JBoss but it can be used for others application servers :) Cheer, Loïc Extranet [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 11/02/2003 02:22 Veuillez répondre à

Re: FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Keith Hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with > spam. You are certainly correct. At least not for people subscribing to mailing lists. > Can the list owners please deal with this guy. They've been asked to already

Re: Missing & misleading documentation, help needed on advanced Jar functionality

2003-02-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It also states falsely, that "This element is identical to the > manifest task". It now says "This element is identical to the manifest task, but its file and mode attributes will be ignored." which is still wrong, Ant will fail because of the n

FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Keith Hatton
I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me. If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam. Can the list owners please deal with this guy. Thanks -Original Message- From: konrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 Februar

RE: Missing & misleading documentation, help needed on advanced Jar functionality

2003-02-11 Thread Keith Hatton
I wouldn't try to make your application into one single jar file. IMHO, it's better to have *your* class files in a jar file whose manifest contains "Class-Path" entries pointing to the other jars your application requires. Then there's no confusion about who supplies which class file, versionin

Missing & misleading documentation, help needed on advanced Jar functionality

2003-02-11 Thread webhiker%tiscali.fr
The problem : I want to combine all the jars required by my application into a single, executable jar file. Ant is good for this. However, the JavaBeans Activation Framework jar needs certain manifest info, else it generates an error : Exception in thread "main" java.lang.SecurityException: no ma

RE: Best Practices for J2EE Project Directory Structures

2003-02-11 Thread Sascha Freitag
Hi, only a short answer in the form of a compressed explanation how we handle our projects actually. By definition all projects could have dependencies from each other (not circular of course). All projects have the same structure, which is: -projectname/ classes/ build/ co