Re: Fastest Frame Rate?

Oops Mea Culpa - Yes "A" version working thanks Alex. Lagi On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 01:25, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi Rick, > > I think you got caught out by a typo in Lagi's mail :-) > > After reading the comments in the forum thread, I'm pret

[ANN] This Week in LiveCode 173

Hi all, Read about new developments in LiveCode open source and the open source community in today's edition of the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter! Read issue #173 here: https://goo.gl/rbd9EG This is a weekly newsletter about LiveCode, focussing on what's been going on in and around

goofy question about "repeat for each"

Hi list, I have a list of values such as : 540,20 542,22... one per line in a variable named cc. Now I'm running the following loop : repeat for each line j in cc add 1 to item 1 of j put return & j after var2 end repeat goofy question : does each iteration of the loop chang

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

Hi jbv, > Am 25.03.2019 um 20:31 schrieb jbv via use-livecode > : > > Hi list, > > I have a list of values such as : > 540,20 > 542,22... > one per line in a variable named cc. > > Now I'm running the following loop : > repeat for each line j in cc > add 1 to item 1 of j > put retu

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

Klaus is correct... cc is not modified by changing j I just did a quick test to verify. Thanks, Brian On Mar 25, 2019, 3:31 PM -0400, jbv via use-livecode , wrote: > Hi list, > > I have a list of values such as : > 540,20 > 542,22... > one per line in a variable named cc. > > Now I'm running the

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

what is the 'item-delimiter" in this case? I don't see commas -- Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - mixstream.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:31 PM jbv via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > I have a list of values such as : >540,20 >542,22... > one

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

Hi Stephen, > Am 25.03.2019 um 21:31 schrieb Stephen Barncard via use-livecode > : > > what is the 'item-delimiter" in this case? I don't see commas the COMMA is the default itemdelimiter, so not neccessary to set it in this example. > -- > Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - > mixstream

Re: password protected stack and passkey

Great! i finally got time to test it, i can open the password protected stack by another stack(standalone) without needing for the password opening the stack with texteditor i see just scrambled txt Nice! Op 20-3-2019 om 18:07 schreef JJS via use-livecode: Ok thank you Andy. I will give th

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

bad vision. sorry -- Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - mixstream.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:42 PM Klaus major-k via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > Am 25.03.2019 um 21:31 schrieb Stephen Barncard via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

Hi again, I finally solved the problem by modifying the loop as follows : repeat for each line j in cc get item 1 of j add 1 to it put return & it & "," & item 2 of j after var2 end repeat But I still don't understand why the previous version led to unexpected values...

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

Hi jbv, you don't even need IT! :-) > Am 25.03.2019 um 22:44 schrieb jbv via use-livecode > : > > Hi again, > > I finally solved the problem by modifying the loop > as follows : >repeat for each line j in cc > ## get item 1 of j > ## add 1 to it > ## put return & it & "," & ite

Carving out stacks (or even just scripts) from a standalone

Has anyone tried doing this lately? I shouldn't really say lately, since the standalone in question was likely built with something like the 4.5 engine, maybe even earlier. I don't think it was encrypted, it's on a Mac, but I also have access to a PC-built version if that makes a difference. Anyon

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

Hi jbv, What version of LC are you using? Here’s a quote from the LC 8.1.10 dictionary: “Starting in version 7.0 it is possible to modify the container variable inside a for each loop without affecting the iterations of the loop.” Could this be biting you? .Jerry > On Mar 25, 2019, at 2:44 PM, jb

RE: password protected stack and passkey

FYI: If the stack is password protected(no line count in PB) you can't access any of the stack's handlers from the message box. I find this annoying but I guess it's safety mechanism. This changed in 8.x I think? In previous versions you could access handlers in a password protected stack from t

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

> Jerry J. wrote: > "Starting in version 7.0 it is possible to modify the container > variable inside a for each loop without affecting the iterations > of the loop." > >> jbv wrote: >> repeat for each line j in cc >> add 1 to item 1 of j >> put return & j after var2 >> end repeat You can't c

Re: password protected stack and passkey

Ralph DiMola wrote: > FYI: If the stack is password protected(no line count in PB) you can't > access any of the stack's handlers from the message box. I find this > annoying but I guess it's safety mechanism. This changed in 8.x I > think? In previous versions you could access handlers in a pass

Re: goofy question about "repeat for each"

My mistake. Thanks for the correction. .Jerry > On Mar 25, 2019, at 7:11 PM, hh via use-livecode > wrote: > >> Jerry J. wrote: >> "Starting in version 7.0 it is possible to modify the container >> variable inside a for each loop without affecting the iterations >> of the loop." >> >>> jbv wrot

Re: Carving out stacks (or even just scripts) from a standalone

Geoff Canyon wrote: > Has anyone tried doing this lately? I shouldn't really say lately, > since the standalone in question was likely built with something > like the 4.5 engine, maybe even earlier. I don't think it was > encrypted, it's on a Mac, but I also have access to a PC-built > version if

Re: password protected stack and passkey

It may have been the problem where the message box stops finding things. It started in LC 9 for me and happened again today. The message box couldn't find a handler in the only card that was open, then couldn't even find the card. Keyboard shortcuts stopped working and "edit script of this card"