I was really blown away by the changes and bug fixes listed in the 8.16rc1
release notes.
Then I looked a bit closer and thought many seemed familiar.
It seems the script to compile the release notes has either gotten greedy or
something else has changed as it has grabbed quite a few additions fr
I use mark smith's library in nearly every project I've done the last 6
months.
Excited to hear this, monte.
Andrew
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> On 27/02/2013, at 1:07 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> > just recently looked into
> > Json and the structure seems very stra
On 27/02/2013, at 1:07 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> just recently looked into
> Json and the structure seems very straight forward
I've told the dev list but not the use list. I will have a desktop JSON
external available shortly under a dual license on all three platforms. It
offers significant sp
ntext:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/wow-tp4661320p4661341.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubsc
On 27/02/2013, at 12:52 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> That would be mind blowing. I'm kind of glad I got started when I did, and
> I'll be around to see the revolution when it happens (and can proudly say I
> was a part of it)
>
> Bring it on!!
Andre is right Mark. It would be a much more worthwhile
't it?
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@.runrev
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
On 27/02/2013, at 12:06 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
> join the open source
> effort for HTML5 deployment it can be done quick and dirty with emscripten
> or at a more elegant and useful level soon thru asm.js and others.
Is there an active project? The stack file export format I've come up with for
Guys,
I think this will never happen and I can explain why:
1 - There are hundreds of other Free Open Source languages in the terms of
the GPL and they were not included in WebKit.
2 - LiveCode has a single vendor. Its not a standard. It has no other
implementation.
3 - LiveCode stacks are binary
Yes it's a huge idea. I'm not sure about the licensing implications for WebKit.
It's currently LGPL so could potentially be integrated in closed source apps.
Adding LC source would force it to be GPL I think so WebKit might need to be
forked for this. The idea definitely highlights what becomes
One kickstarter comment:
Carl Garcia 14 minutes ago
@Larry Tesler. Hi Larry --Carl from the "original" Apple Cocoa project here
:)...glad to hear you are contributing here as well.
@Everyone, just wanted to seed the idea that LC could, in theory, now be
integrated into WebToolkit under the GP
10 matches
Mail list logo
