Re: use-livecode Digest, Vol 87, Issue 3

2010-12-03 Thread Bob Sneidar
I knew that... On Dec 3, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote: > On 02.12.10 at 20:40 -0800 John Burtt apparently wrote: >> Wouldn't more terms just add to the confusion. >> >> Separate stacks are called "main" stacks. >> The stacks that are part of (within) a main stack are called "sub" sta

Re: use-livecode Digest, Vol 87, Issue 3

2010-12-03 Thread Bob Sneidar
How about short stacks? Makes me hungry for some reason... On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:40 PM, John Burtt wrote: > On Dec 2, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Jacqueline Landman Gay wrote: > >> >> We need an official term for those separate stacks that ship with >> standalones. >> >> -- Jacqueline Landman Gay

Re: use-livecode Digest, Vol 87, Issue 3

2010-12-03 Thread Robert Brenstein
On 02.12.10 at 20:40 -0800 John Burtt apparently wrote: Wouldn't more terms just add to the confusion. Separate stacks are called "main" stacks. The stacks that are part of (within) a main stack are called "sub" stacks. Sub stacks that are separated from their main stack, become main stacks. A m

Re: use-livecode Digest, Vol 87, Issue 3

2010-12-02 Thread John Burtt
On Dec 2, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Jacqueline Landman Gay wrote: We need an official term for those separate stacks that ship with standalones. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com Wouldn't more t